Skip to main content
Advice

Composable architecture vs front-end composability: What’s the difference?

  • Ryan Bromley

    Product owner and content strategist

8 July 2025

At a glance:

  • Composable architecture means breaking your digital ecosystem into modular, interchangeable services connected by APIs.
  • Front-end composability involves building your user interface from modular, reusable components – often governed by a design system.
  • Composable architecture is about long-term technical flexibility – so you’re not locked into a monolith when a new requirement emerges.
  • Front-end composability is about agility and consistency – so your brand and user experience scale smoothly across every touchpoint.
  • You need both working together to build a digital estate that can evolve as your organisation and audience do.

Composability is everywhere – but what does it actually mean?

If you’ve spent time planning a new website, assessing your CMS, or reviewing your digital strategy recently, you’ve probably come across the word composable. Whether it’s vendors like us pitching a “composable DXP,” architects designing a “composable stack,” or designers building a “composable design system,” it seems to pop up everywhere.

It’s quickly become one of those industry terms that feels essential but often gets glossed over without a shared definition.

The challenge is that composability can mean very different things depending on who you’re talking to. This isn’t just a matter of semantics – misunderstanding it can lead organisations to invest heavily in new tools or approaches without actually solving the problems that slow them down.

In this article, we’ll break down two of the most important – and often confused – ways people use the term composability: composable architecture and front-end composability. We’ll look at what each means, why they both matter, and how they work together to create a more flexible, future-proof digital presence.

What is composable architecture?

Composable architecture is about how your digital systems are structured – or put another way, how your software architecture is designed. In software, architecture simply refers to how different systems and services are organised and how they connect to each other.

Instead of relying on a single, all-in-one platform (often called a monolith) that does everything from content management to search to personalisation, composable architecture breaks this into smaller, specialised services connected by APIs. This allows you to select best-of-breed systems for each function. Your headless CMS might handle structured content, a separate digital asset management system (DAM) manages media assets, an external search service powers site-wide indexing, and a dedicated platform runs personalisation.

Why it matters

A composable approach means your architecture can evolve alongside your organisation.

An API-first strategy means each piece can evolve or be swapped out without needing to rebuild your entire website. If a new channel emerges, or your personalisation needs grow, you can adapt without a costly and time-consuming rebuild.

It’s an architecture designed for change – perfect for large organisations managing complex digital estates that can’t afford multi-year replatforming cycles every time strategy shifts.

The downside of composable architecture

A truly composable architecture often means assembling this ecosystem yourself – choosing individual tools, integrating them, and maintaining all the connections. For many teams, that level of technical ownership can end up being more work than anticipated and can actually slow down digital transformation rather than speed it up.

While the flexibility is powerful, the responsibility for stitching everything together sits squarely with your team. It demands technical expertise, rigorous project management, and careful long-term planning.

This is why we’ve been evolving Contensis from a headless CMS into a composable digital experience platform. It provides the essential building blocks of a modern DXP out of the box – structured content models, asset management, forms and soon personalisation – while still offering REST APIs, webhooks, and integrations that let you replace or extend any part of the system. It means you don’t have to choose between the risk of locking into a monolithic platform and the complexity of assembling everything yourself.

What is front-end composability?

If composable architecture is about your tech stack, front-end composability is all about how your website looks, behaves, and delivers your brand experience to your users.

It’s the idea of building your user interface from modular, reusable components – often governed by a design system.

Instead of designing each page from scratch, you work with a library of pre-defined building blocks such as hero banners, testimonial sliders, cards for programmes or services, and call-to-action sections.

Each of these is designed to slot into different pages and contexts, while maintaining consistent styles, interactions, and brand voice. This makes it easier to roll out cohesive, on-brand experiences across multiple sites or departments – and empowers teams to move faster without reinventing layouts from scratch.

Why it matters

Front-end composability helps you scale your design and user experience. It ensures consistency, speeds up page creation, and makes it easier to maintain your brand across different departments, sites, or even an entire digital estate.

It also gives marketing and UX teams the confidence to focus on messaging and storytelling – without worrying that each new campaign will break the design or require starting from a blank canvas.

What it takes to deliver front-end composability

Achieving front-end composability isn’t just about choosing the right front-end framework or buying a new tool. It relies on some important foundations:

  • A robust design system:
    Your components need to be underpinned by shared styles, patterns, and interaction rules so they work consistently across different contexts and touchpoints.
  • Reusable, modular components:
    Whether you’re using React, Vue, or another framework, you’ll need to build (or adopt) a library of flexible components that can adapt to different content and page structures.
  • Structured content:
    Your CMS has to deliver content in a way your components can consume predictably – without every page becoming a bespoke build. A traditional CMS often mixes content and design together, storing it in rich text fields tightly coupled to presentation. That makes it hard to reuse across different pages, channels, or components – or to deliver it consistently through your design system.
  • Clear governance and workflows:
    Without shared rules, even the best design system can become disjointed over time. Roles, responsibilities, and approval flows keep teams aligned.
  • Tools that support this model:
    From your CMS to your front-end build pipeline, your tech stack needs to support reusable components and structured delivery.

Getting these pieces right upfront makes it much easier to scale consistent, on-brand experiences – even across multiple sites, departments, or campaigns.

This is also why platforms like Contensis are designed around structured content models, flexible layouts, and clear editorial governance. They give you the freedom to build composable front ends without having to bolt everything together from scratch.

Why you need both

It’s easy to see why composable architecture and front-end composability often get muddled together. They’re both about breaking big, rigid systems into smaller, more manageable parts. They both lean on APIs. They both promise flexibility.

But they solve different problems:

Composable architectureFront-end composability
FocusSystems, data, integrationsUX, layouts, brand consistency
Driven byAPIs connecting independent servicesDesign systems, UI components and structured content
Owned byIT and development teamsMarketing, UX, and design teams
Why it mattersFuture-proofs your tech stackScales your user experience and brand

You might have the most flexible back end possible, but if your front end is still tied up in rigid templates, you’ll struggle to launch new campaigns or keep your brand consistent. Flip it around, layering a beautiful design system on top of a rigid monolithic stack might look slick – until you need to integrate a new tool, localise content at scale, or deliver new content to emerging channels.

The real strength of composability comes when both layers work together. When your architecture is composable, you can adapt your systems over time. When your front end is composable, you can adapt your experiences for different audiences, campaigns, or business goals – all while staying true to your brand.

That’s how you build a truly future-proof digital estate – one that can respond to new channels, new user needs, and new organisational priorities without constant large-scale rebuilds.

Whether you’re already moving toward a composable model or just starting to explore what’s possible, taking time to understand these two dimensions can help you avoid missteps and build a more resilient, scalable digital estate.

What’s next

In the next post, we’ll dive deeper into front-end composability, looking at how design systems and component-driven approaches can give your teams the freedom to build faster while staying firmly on brand.

Ready to see where you stand?

If you’re wondering how composable your current website is – on the front end or in the stack – keep an eye out for our upcoming checklist. Or, if you’re planning a new digital project now, we’d be happy to have a chat.

  • Ryan Bromley

    Product owner and content strategist

Advice
8 July 2025

Related blog posts